COMPARATIVE FEATURES OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF MUSCLE TISSUE

  • M.Yu. Skvortsova Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University. 2 Lithuania, Saint Petersburg 194100 Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5781-5771
  • M.V. Petyalina Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University. 2 Lithuania, Saint Petersburg 194100 Russian Federation
  • N.K. Apraksina Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University. 2 Lithuania, Saint Petersburg 194100 Russian Federation
  • V.G. Kozhukhar Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University. 2 Lithuania, Saint Petersburg 194100 Russian Federation
Keywords: muscle tissues, structural and functional unit, the unit of contractility, muscle contraction, ultrastructural features, the motor unit, regenerative ability, histogenetic classification

Abstract

Muscle tissues are widespread in the human organism. Since their main feature is ability to contractility, their sarcoplasm (cytoplasm) contains a well-developed contractile apparatus, which can have its specific characteristics in different muscle tissues. Muscle tissues differ from each other not only in their localization and structural characteristics, but also in their origin, as well as their ability to regenerate. There are two main classifications of muscle tissues: morphological one taking into account the peculiarities of the structure of the contractile apparatus, and histogenetic one taking into account the origin of tissue. According to the morphofunctional classification, muscle tissues are divided into striated (cross-striated) and smooth. In turn, striated tissues are divided into skeletal and cardiac. The main tissue element of skeletal muscle tissue is myosymplast, which is formed during embryogenesis as a result of the fusion of myoblast cells. The main tissue element of cardiac muscle tissue are cells — cardiomyocytes, which during embryogenesis connect with each other to form fibers. The main tissue element of smooth muscle tissue are cells — smooth myocytes, which during embryonic development can migrate from different rudiments. Muscle tissue of internal organs and vessels has a mesenchymal origin, the muscles of the iris of the eyeball are neural, myoepithelial cells of glands are ectodermal. Despite the fact that the structure and origin of the muscle tissues are well studied, in recent years a lot of information has appeared from the field of molecular biology concerning their development in embryogenesis. In addition the issues of regenerative capabilities of different types of muscle tissues remain debatable. Skeletal muscle tissue shows the greatest regenerative abilities. Its regeneration is provided by satellite cells (myosatellitocytes), which isolate themselves on the surface of skeletal muscle fiber during intrauterine development, without fusing with it and preserving regenerative abilities due to the protein Pax7 expressed by myoblasts that are the precursors of myosatellitocytes. Until now, there is no unambiguous data on the regenerative capabilities of cardiomyocytes. There is controversial information in the literature about the possible role of cells c-kit+ as cardiac stem cells. However, they cannot provide full-fleged regeneration due to their small quantity in the myocardium. Smooth myocytes of blood vessels and internal organs are capable of reparative regeneration, which is provided by cells entering mitosis when smooth muscle tissue is damaged. But the question remains not fully clarified, which cells are capable of performing this function. Clarification of issues related to the regeneration of various types of muscle tissue may be of great importance for practical medicine.

References

Аббакумова Л.Н., Арсентьев В.Г., Гнусаев С.Ф., Иванова И.И., Кадурина Т.И., Трисветова Е.Л., Чемоданов В.В., Чухловина М.Л. Наследственные и многофакторные нарушения со­единительной ткани у детей. Алгоритмы диагностики. Тактика ведения. Российские рекомендации. Педиатр. 2016;7(2):5–39. DOI: 10.17816/PED725-39.

Башилова Е.Н., Зашихин А.Л., Агафонов Ю.В. К вопросу о клеточных механизмах реактивности гладких мышечных тканей некоторых висцеральных органов. Экология человека. 2014; 11:20–25.

Валькович Э.И., Батюто Т.Д., Кожухарь В.Г. и др. Общая и медицинская эмбриология. СПб.: Фолиант; 2003. EDN: XRDNOT.

Велш У., Атлас гистологии. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2011.

Гартнер Л.П., Хайатт Д.Л. Цветной атлас гистологии. М.: Лого­сфера; 2008.

Голованова Т.А., Белостоцкая Г.Б. Способность миокарда крыс к самообновлению в экспериментах invitro: пролиферативная активность неонатальных кардиомиоцитов. Клеточная трансплантация и тканевая инженерия. 2011;4(4):66–70.

Данилов Р.К., Одинцова И.А. Мышечная система. В кн.: Руководство по гистологии. T. 1. СПб.: СпецЛит; 2008: 425–490.

Зашихин А.Л. Гладкая мышечная ткань. В кн.: Руководство по гистологии. T. 1. СПб.: СпецЛит; 2008:472–482.

Иванов А. Развитие скелетных мышц и регенерация за счет клеток-сателлитов реализуется за счет различных генетических программ. Клеточная трансплантация и тканевая инженерия. 2009;4(4):16–17.

Карелина Н.Р., Ким Т.И. Перинеология. Анатомия промежности. Мышцы и фасции (лекция). Российские биомедицинские исследования. 2020;5(3):44–58.

Кожухарь В.Г., Иванов Д.О. Основные этапы формирования органов и систем плода. В кн.: Руководство по перинатологии. T. 1. СПб.: Информ-Навигатор; 2019:295–337.

Лебедева А.И., Муслимов С.А. Стимуляция аутоиммунных и коммитированных клеток в ишемически поврежденном миокарде. Российский кардиологический журнал. 2018;23(11):123–129.

Мелихов В.С. Создание функциональной ткани молочной железы из одной стволовой клетки. Гены и клетки. 2006;1(1):21–22.

Ноздрин В.И., Белоусова Т.А., Пьявченко Т.А., Волков Ю.Т. Гистология в кратком изложении. М.: Ретиноиды; 2019.

Тамбовцева Р.В. Возрастные и типологические особенности энергетики мышечной деятельности. Автореф. дис. … докт. биол. наук. М.; 2002.

Хлопонин П.А., Маркова Л.И., Патюченко О.Ю. Проблемы гистогенеза и регенерации сердечной, гладкой и скелетной мышечной ткани в трудах ростовских гистологов. Журнал фундаментальной медицины и биологии. 2014;3:4–12.

Улумбеков Э.Г., Челышев Ю.А., ред. Гистология. Учебник для вузов. М.: ГЭОТАР-МЕД; 2001.

Anthony L. Mescher. Junqueira's Basic Histology: Text and Atlas. 13th Edition, McGraw Hill LLC; 2009.

Anversa P., Kajstura J., Rota M. et al. Regenerating new heart with stem cells. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(1):62–70.

Bergmann O. Stadies of myocardial regeneration. Stockholm. Published by Karolinska Institutet. 2010:35.

Charge S.B., Rudnicki M.A. Cellular and molecular regulation of muscle regeneration. Physiological Reviews. 2004;84:209–238.

Relax F., Rocancourt D. et al. Pax3/Hax7-dependent population of skeletalmuscle progenitor ceels. Nature. 2005;435:948–953.

Ross M.H., Pawlina W. Histology: text and atlas. 6 ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2010.

Van Berlo J.H., Kanisicak O., Maillet M. et al. C-kit+ ceels minimally contribute cardiomyocytes to the heart. Nature. 2014;509:337–341.

West J.B. Best and Taylor’s physiological basic of medical practice. Baltimore. Williams and Wilkins. 1990.

Published
2025-05-23
How to Cite
Skvortsova, M., Petyalina, M., Apraksina, N., & Kozhukhar, V. (2025). COMPARATIVE FEATURES OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF MUSCLE TISSUE . Russian Biomedical Research, 9(4), 74-85. https://doi.org/10.56871/RBR.2024.37.29.012
Section
LECTURES