REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE OF THE USE OF NATIONAL MEDICAL INCIDENT REPORTING SYSTEMS

  • K.A. Barsegova Moscow Multidisciplinary Clinical Center “Kommunarka” of Moscow Healthcare Department. 8 Sosensky Stan str., Moscow Kommunarka 108814 Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4416-3309
  • V.Yu. Petrova Moscow Multidisciplinary Clinical Center “Kommunarka” of Moscow Healthcare Department. 8 Sosensky Stan str., Moscow Kommunarka 108814 Russian Federation
  • D.N. Protsenko Moscow Multidisciplinary Clinical Center “Kommunarka” of Moscow Healthcare Department. 8 Sosensky Stan str., Moscow Kommunarka 108814 Russian Federation
  • R.K. Kogotyzhev Moscow Multidisciplinary Clinical Center “Kommunarka” of Moscow Healthcare Department. 8 Sosensky Stan str., Moscow Kommunarka 108814 Russian Federation
  • O.N. Fedenistova Moscow Multidisciplinary Clinical Center “Kommunarka” of Moscow Healthcare Department. 8 Sosensky Stan str., Moscow Kommunarka 108814 Russian Federation
Keywords: incidents, quality of healthcare, adverse events, foreign practice

Abstract

Analysis of adverse events that happen in medical organizations has proved to be a crucial instrument of improvement of quality and safety of healthcare. Foreign countries make ample use of national incident reporting systems for this aim. The work of national incident reporting systems involves not only leaders and managers of healthcare but the personnel of medical organizations as well. National systems accumulate information, analyze it and later based on this analysis the organizational decisions are being made, which are aimed at correction and prevention of future faults or associated problems in the medical organizations. Unified national system like this does not exist in the Russian Federation that is why the aim of this research was to analyze the foreign practice of using national incident reporting systems in order to form recommendations for the creation of similar system in the Russian Federation. In this study practical experience of Denmark, United Kingdom, China and Kazakhstan was described, the negative and positive aspects of the organizational decisions of these countries were highlighted, as well as the results of their performance were presented. Based on the given information the recommendations on the creation of a similar system in the Russian Federation were proposed including improvement of legislation norms, the use of digital solutions while designing and implementing the system, which will be improved regularly based on feedback and the results of performance check. It is also necessary to ensure that this system will be easy to use, transparent and fair.

References

Howell A.M., Burns E.M., Bouras G., Donaldson L.J., Athanasiou T., Darzi A. Can Patient Safety Incident Reports Be Used to Compare Hospital Safety? Results from a Quantitative Analysis of the English National Reporting and Learning System Data. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0144107. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144107.

Patient safety incident reporting and learning systems: technical report and guidance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240010338 (accessed: 16.09.2024).

Carlfjord S., Öhrn A. & Gunnarsson A. Experiences from ten years of incident reporting in health care: a qualitative study among department managers and coordinators. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:113. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-2876-5.

Nygren M., Roback K., Öhrn A. et al. Factors influencing patient safety in Sweden: perceptions of patient safety officers in the county councils. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:52. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-52.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Peer Review of a Report on Strategies to Improve Patient Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available at: https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/26136/peer-review-of-a-report-on-strategies-to-improve-patient-safety (accessed: 16.09.2024).

Ridelberg M., Roback K., Nilsen P., Carlfjord S. Patient safety work in Sweden: quantitative and qualitative ana­lysis of annual patient safety reports. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:98. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1350-5.

Moeller A., Rasmussen K., Nielsen K. Learning and feedback from the Danish patient safety incident repor­ting system can be improved. Danish medical journal. 2016;63:1–5.

Tchijevitch O., Birkeland S. F., Bogh S.B., Hallas J. Identifying high risk medications and error types in Da­nish patient safety database using disproportionality ana­lysis, Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2024;33(2):e5735. DOI: 10.1002/pds.5735.

Trier H., Valderas J.M., Wensing M. et al. Involving patients in patient safety programmes: a scoping review and consensus procedure by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care. Eur J Gen Pract. 2015;21(Suppl 1):56–61.

Christiansen A.B., Simonsen S., Nielsen G.A. Patients Own Safety Incidents Reports to the Danish Patient Safety Database Possess a Unique but Underused Learning Potential in Patient Safety. J Patient Saf. 2021;17(8):e1480–e1487. DOI: 10.1097/PTS.000000000000060.

Lundgaard M., Raboel L., Jensen E.B., Anhoej J., Peder­sen B.L. et al. The Danish patient safety experience: the Act on Patient Safety in the Danish health care system. Italian Journal of Public Health. 2005;2. DOI: 10.2427/5966.

Tilma J., Nørgaard M., Mikkelsen K.L., Johnsen S.P. Exis­ting data sources for clinical epidemiology: the Da­nish Patient Compensation Association database, Clin Epidemiol. 2015;7:347–353. DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S84162.

Rabøl L.I., Gaardboe O., Hellebek A. Incident reporting must result in local action. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26(6):515–516. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005971.

Optimisation of the Danish incident reporting system. The Danish Society for Patient Safety. 2016. Avai­lable at: https://gammel.patientsikkerhed.dk/content/uploads/2016/09/optimisationofthedanishincidentrepor­tingsystem.pdf (accessed: 16.09.2024).

Katikireddi V. National reporting system for medical errors is launched. BMJ. 2004;328(7438):481. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.328.7438.481.

Williams S.K., Osborn S.S. The development of the National Reporting and Learning System in England and Wales, 2001–2005. The Medical journal of Australia. 2006;184:65–68. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00366.x.

NRLS national patient safety incident reports: commentary October 2022. Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/NAPSIR-commentary-Oct-22-FINAL-v4.pdf (accessed: 16.09.2024).

LFPSE: Online Record Patient Safety Events Service (Standard Access) — User Guidance. Available at: https://record.learn-from-patient-safety-events.nhs.uk/user-guide/standard (accessed: 16.09.2024).

de Wet C., O’Donnell C., Bowie P. Developing a preli­minary ‘never event’ list for general practice using consensus-building methods. Br J Gen Pract. 2014;64:159–167. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp14X677536.

Care Quality Commission. Opening the Door to Change. NHS Safety Culture and the Need for Transformation. 2018. Avai­lable at: https://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/20181224_openingthedoor_report.pdf. (accessed: 16.09.2024).

Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch. Never events: analysis of HSIB’s national investigations. HSIB, 2021. Available at: https://www.hssib.org.uk/patient-safety-investigations/never-events-analysis-of-hsibs-national-investigations/investigation-report/#6-conclusions-and-safety-recommendations (accessed: 16.09.2024).

NHS Resolution. Being fair: supporting a just and lear­ning culture for staff and patients following incidents in the NHS. 2019. Available at: https://resolution.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/NHS-Resolution-Being-Fair-Report-2.pdf (accessed: 16.09.2024).

NHS England and Improvements. A just culture guide. 2018. Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/patient-safety/a-just-culture-guide/ (accessed: 16.09.2024).

Tasker A., Jones J., Brake S. How effectively has a Just Culture been adopted? A qualitative study to analyse the attitudes and behaviours of clinicians and managers to clinical incident management within an NHS Hospital Trust and identify enablers and barriers to achieving a Just Culture. BMJ Open Qual. 2023;12(1):e002049. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002049.

Gao X., Yan S., Wu W., Zhang R., Lu Y., Xiao S. Implications from China patient safety incidents reporting system. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2019;15:259–267. DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S190117.

Xiang Z., Jin Q., Gao X., Li X., Liu H., Qiao K., Jiang B. Perception of Patient Safety and the Reporting System Between Medical Staffs and Patients in China: A Cross-Sectional Online Study. J Patient Saf. 2022;18(1):297–307. DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000773.

Zhang X., Ma S., Sun X., Zhang Y., Chen W., Chang Q., Pan H., Zhang X., Shen L., Huang Y. Composition and risk assessment of perioperative patient safety incidents reported by anesthesiologists from 2009 to 2019: a single-center retrospective cohort study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021;21(1):8. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-020-01226-0.

Zhou P., Bai F., Tang H.Q., Bai J., Li M.Q., Xue D. Patient safety climate in general public hospitals in China: diffe­rences associated with department and job type based on a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open. 2018;8(4):e015604. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015604.

He H., Chen X., Tian L., Long Y., Li L., Yang N., Tang S. Perceived patient safety culture and its associated factors among clinical managers of tertiary hospitals: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Nurs. 2023;22(1):329. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-023-01494-4.

Published
2024-12-27
How to Cite
Barsegova, K., Petrova, V., Protsenko, D., Kogotyzhev, R., & Fedenistova, O. (2024). REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE OF THE USE OF NATIONAL MEDICAL INCIDENT REPORTING SYSTEMS. Medicine and Organization of Health Care, 9(3), 141-150. https://doi.org/10.56871/MHCO.2024.33.77.001
Section
Статьи