MODERN CLASSIFICATIONS OF MUSCLE INJURIES IN THE DIAGNOSIS AND REHABILITATION OF ATHLETES

  • D.Yu. Butko Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University. 2 Lithuania, Saint Petersburg 194100 Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6284-0943
  • I.N. Frolov Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University. 2 Lithuania, Saint Petersburg 194100 Russian Federation
  • S.V. Vtyurin Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University. 2 Lithuania, Saint Petersburg 194100 Russian Federation
  • M.M. Kosarev Medical Rehabilitation Center FC “Zenit”. 1 Football Alley, Saint Petersburg 197110 Russian Federation
  • L.A. Danilenko Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University. 2 Lithuania, Saint Petersburg 194100 Russian Federation
  • M.V. Kalinina Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University. 2 Lithuania, Saint Petersburg 194100 Russian Federation
  • E.M. Artemyeva Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University. 2 Lithuania, Saint Petersburg 194100 Russian Federation
  • D.A. Krasavina Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University. 2 Lithuania, Saint Petersburg 194100 Russian Federation
Keywords: sports medicine, rehabilitation, muscle injuries, injuries in football, classifications of muscle injuries

Abstract

Introduction. Muscle injuries are widespread among high-achieving athletes, especially in dynamic sports such as football. About 30% of all football injuries are muscle injuries, which negatively affects the team’s results, as athletes are forced to miss games during recovery. Classification systems of muscle injuries are very important for the prognosis of rehabilitation therapy and recovery of athletes. The problem of applying a unified classification in the practice of specialists as the basis for rehabilitation protocols for soft tissue injuries is still relevant. The aim of the study was to evaluate the informative value of the British Classification of Muscle Injuries (BAMIC) as one of the main tools in the diagnosis of muscle injuries, prediction of recovery and prevention of repeated injuries in athletes. To substantiate the possibility of using the BAMIC classification in the creation of individual rehabilitation protocols for athletes. Materials and methods. An analysis of the scientific English-language literature in PubMed (NLM), Web of Science (Clarivate), which describing the application of the BAMIC classification, an assessment of the time of return to the play (RTP) and the re-injury rate (RIR) after muscle injuries in athletes was carried out. Results. the high diagnostic and prognostic value of using the BAMIC in the practice of a doctor was noted. A statistical significance was revealed between the degree of injury, the site of injury and/or a combination of the degree of muscle injury and the site of injury with RTP according to the BAMIC classification. It was found that the increase in RIR depended on the degree and localization of damage. Conclusion. The British classification of muscle injuries is justifiably widely used by the world community to assess athletes’ muscle injuries. The superiority of BAMIC over previously known classifications is due to the fact that on its basis it is possible to predict the time of RTP and the RIR, which can be effectively used to develop individual rehabilitation protocols.

 

References

Репетюк А.Д., Ачкасов Е.Е., Середа А.П., Жестянкин Н.Р. Оценка показателей гониометрии голеностопного сустава в комплексной реабилитации спортсменов с тендинопатией малоберцовых сухожилий. Спортивная медицина: наука и практика. 2022;12(2):40–45. DOI: 10.47529/2223-2524.2022.2.4.

Alonso J.M., Edouard P., Fischetto G., Adams B., Depiesse F., Mountjoy M. Determination of future prevention strategies in elite track and field: analysis of Daegu 2011 IAAF Championships injuries and illnesses surveillance. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46(7):505–514.

Ekstrand J., Hagglund M., Walden M. Epidemiology of muscle injuries in professional football (soccer). Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(6):1226–1232. DOI: 10.1177/0363546510395879.

Freckleton G., Pizzari T. Risk factors for hamstring muscle strain injury in sport: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(6):351–358. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2011-090664.

Pollock N., James S.L., Lee J.C., Chakraverty R. British athletics muscle injury classification: a new grading system. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(18):1347–1351. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093302.

Woods C., Hawkins R.D., Maltby S. et al. The Football Association Medical Research Programme: an audit of injuries in professional football — analysis of hamstring injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2004;38(1):36–41. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2002.002352.

Mueller-Wohlfahrt H.W., Ueblacker P., Haensel L., Garrett W.E. Muscle injuries in sports. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme; 2013.

Ueblacker P., Müller-Wohlfahrt H.W., Ekstrand J. Epidemiological and clinical outcome comparison of indirect (“strain”) versus direct (“contusion”) anterior and posterior thigh muscle injuries in male elite football players: UEFA Elite League study of 2287 thigh injuries (2001–2013). Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(22):1461–1466. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094285.

Maxey L., Magnusson J. Rehabilitation for the post­surgical orthopedic patient. 3rd ed. Oxnard, California: Elsevier; 2007.

Mueller-Wohlfahrt H-W., Haensel L., Mithoefer K. et al. Muscle injuries in sports. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47:342–350. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091448.

Беляев А.А., Бутко Д.Ю., Бисага Г.Н., Вознюк И.А., Гориславец В.А., Дыскин Д.Е., Емелин А.Ю., Емельянов А.Ю., Живолупов С.А., Заболотский Н.Н., Загрядский П.В., Зинченко В.А., Иванов Ю.С., Искра Д.А., Котельников С.А., Кузнецов А.Н., Курпатов В.И., Литвиненко И.В., Лобзин С.В., Михайленко А.А. Част­ная неврология. СПб.: Мир медицины; 2022.

Volpi P., Bisciotti G.N. Muscle injury in the athlete. 1st ed. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2019.

Shamji R., James S.L.J., Botchu R., Khurniawan K.A., Bhogal G., Rushton A. Association of the British Athletic Muscle Injury Classification and anatomic location with return to full training and reinjury following hamstring injury in elite football. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2021;7(2):e001010. DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2020-001010.

Valle X., Alentorn-Geli E., Tol J.L., Hamilton B., Gar­rett W.E. Jr, Pruna R., Til L., Gutierrez J.A., Alomar X., Balius R., Malliaropoulos N., Monllau J.C., Whiteley R., Witvrouw E., Samuelsson K., Rodas G. Muscle in­juries in sports: A new evidence-informed and expert consensus-based classification with clinical application. Sports Med. 2017;47(7):1241–1253.

Ekstrand J., Healy J.C., Walden M. et al. Hamstring muscle injuries in professional football: the cor­relation of MRI findings with return to play. Br J Sports Med. 2011;46(2):112–117. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2011-090155.

Meeuwisse W.H., Sellmer R., Hagel B.E. Rates and risks of injury during intercollegiate basketball. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(3):379–385. DOI: 10.1177/

Pollock N., James S.L., Lee J.C. et al. British athletics muscle injury: a new grading system. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(18):1347–1351. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093302.

Pezzotta G., Querques G., Pecorelli A., Nani R., Sironi S. MRI detection of soleus muscle injuries in professional football players. Skeletal Radiology. 2017;46(11):1513–1520. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-017-2729-z.

Pollock N., Kelly S., Lee J. et al. A 4-year study of hamstring injury outcomes in elite track and field using the British Athletics rehabilitation approach. Br J Sports Med. 2022;56(5):257–263. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103791.

Pollock N., Patel A., Chakraverty J., Suokas A., James S.L., Chakraverty R. Time to return to full training is delayed and recurrence rate is higher in intratendinous (“c”) acute hamstring injury in elite track and field athletes: clinical application of the British Athletics Muscle Injury Classification. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(5):305–310. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094657.

Slavotinek J. Muscle injury: the role of imaging in prognostic assignment and monitoring of muscle repair. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2010;14(2):194–200. DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1253160.

Pollock N., Kelly S., Lee J. et al. A 4-year study of hamstring injury outcomes in elite track and field using the British Athletics rehabilitation approach. Br J Sports Med. 2022;56(5):257–263. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103791.

Biglands J.D., Grainger A.J., Robinson P. et al. MRI in acute muscle tears in athletes: can quantitative T2 and DTI predict return to play better than visual assessment? Eur Radiol. 2020;30(12):6603–6613. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06999-z.

Nescolarde L., Terricabras J., Mecho S., Rodas G., Yanguas J. Differentiation between tendinous, myo­tendinous and myofascial injuries by L-BIA in professional football players. Front Physiol. 2020;4(11):

DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.574124.

Pezzotta G., Querques G., Pecorelli A., Nani R., Sironi S. MRI detection of soleus muscle injuries in professional football players. Skelet Radiol. 2017;46(11):1513–1520. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-017-2729-z.

Pezzotta G., Pecorelli A., Querques G., Biancardi S., Morzenti C., Sironi S. MRI characteristics of adductor longus lesions in professional football players and prognostic factors for return to play. Eur J Radiol. 2018;108:52–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.09.018.

Wangensteen A., Guermazi A., Tol J.L. et al. New MRI muscle classification systems and associations with return to sport after acute hamstring injuries: a prospective study. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(8):3532–3541. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5125-0.

Просвирнина М.С., Даниленко Л.А., Шмонин А.А., Бутко Д.Ю. Методы оценки толерантности к физической нагрузке у детей. University Therapeutic Journal. 2023;5(2):39–56. DOI: 10.56871/UTJ.2023.99.19.004.

Калинин А.В, Бутко Д.Ю., Давыдов А.Т. Врачебно-­педагогические наблюдения и врачебно-контрольные исследования в современном спорте, осуществляемые совместно врачом и тренером: учебное пособие для ординаторов и врачей. СПб.: СПбГПМУ; 2023.

Давыдов А.Т., Бутко Д.Ю., Даниленко Л.А., Артамонова М.В. Диагностика и реабилитация детей и подростков с болевым синдромом. Давиденковские чтения. Сборник тезисов докладов XXIV Конгресса с международным участием. СПб.; 2022:70–72.

Александрова Г.А., Бачманов А.А., Булкина И.А. и др. Здоровье населения региона и приоритеты здравоохранения. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2010. EDN: UKMFFR.

Петрова Е.Ю., Пахомова М.А. Психологическая реабилитация пациентов с последствиями физической травмы методом восстановления микродвигательных реакций. Педиатр. 2016;7(3):136–146. DOI: 10.17816/PED73136-146.

Баиндурашвили А.Г., Шапиро К.И., Дрожжина Л.А., Вишняков А.Н. Показатели и динамика травм костно-мышечной системы у детей Санкт-Петербурга в современных условиях. Педиатр. 2016;7(2):113–120. DOI: 10.17816/PED72113-120.

Reurink G., Brilman E.G., de Vos R.J., Maas M., Moen M.H., Weir A., Goudswaard G.J., Tol J.L. Ma­gnetic resonance imaging in acute hamstring injury: can we provide a return to play prognosis? Sports Med. 2015;45(1):133–146. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-014-0243-1.

Wangensteen A., Almusa E., Boukarroum S., Farooq A., Hamilton B., Whiteley R., Bahr R., Tol J.L. MRI does not add value over and above patient history and clinical examination in predicting time to return to sport after acute hamstring injuries: a prospective cohort of 180 male athletes. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(24):1579–1587.

Published
2025-08-28
How to Cite
Butko, D., Frolov, I., Vtyurin, S., Kosarev, M., Danilenko, L., Kalinina, M., Artemyeva, E., & Krasavina, D. (2025). MODERN CLASSIFICATIONS OF MUSCLE INJURIES IN THE DIAGNOSIS AND REHABILITATION OF ATHLETES. Medicine: Theory and Practice, 10(2), 66-75. https://doi.org/10.56871/MTP.2025.70.92.007
Section
REVIEWS