DIFFICULTIES IN DECISION-MAKING WHEN PROVIDING CARE TO PATIENTS WITH MASSIVE PULMONARY EMBOLISM AND OBSTRUCTIVE SHOCK (THE EXPERIENCE OF THE MARIINSKY HOSPITAL)

  • K.A. Averchenko City Mariinsky Hospital. Liteyny Ave., 56, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 191014
  • A.A. Andreenko City Mariinsky Hospital. Liteyny Ave., 56, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 191014
  • M.S. Mitichkin City Mariinsky Hospital. Liteyny Ave., 56, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 191014
  • A.B. Naumov City Mariinsky Hospital. Liteyny Ave., 56, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 191014
  • E.V. Timofeev Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University. Lithuania 2, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 194100 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9607-4028
Keywords: pulmonary embolism, obstructive shock, anticoagulant therapy, emergency care, thrombolytic therapy

Abstract

Introduction. Pulmonary embolism (PE) is one of the most common cardiovascular accidents with a fairly high mortality rate. The development of unstable hemodynamics (obstructive shock) in a patient with PE, up to circulatory arrest, significantly worsens the prognosis and increases mortality. Algorithms for the management of such patients remain inconsistent; the prevalence of obstructive shock with PE in Russia is practically not covered in the literature. Materials and methods. The medical records of 19 patients from 33 to 94 years old, hospitalized at the Mariinsky City Hospital with pulmonary embolism and hemodynamic instability or circulatory arrest, were analyzed. Results. To confirm PE, echocardiography was performed (10 patients, 52.6%), of which 2 were performed in the shock room (signs of overload of the right chambers of the heart were detected), 7 in the intensive care unit (in 28.6% patterns of overload of the right chambers of the heart were not visualized), 1 patient was performed on the 18th day from admission during treatment. Thrombi in the right chambers of the heart were not visualized in patients. To search for the source of thrombosis, ultrasound examination of the veins of the lower extremities was performed (n=16); deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities was detected in 56.3%. A CT scan to confirm pulmonary embolism was performed on all patients within an average of 62 minutes, except for two patients who were admitted with circulatory arrest and were subsequently declared to have a fatal outcome in the setting of acute medical conditions. Half of the patients received prehospital anticoagulant therapy;  thrombolytic therapy was performed in 47.3% of patients (n=9). In 2/3 of cases, thrombolytic therapy was carried out after transporting patients to the intensive care unit with tissue plasminogen activator and forteplase drugs for an average of 2.5 hours (from 90 to 210 minutes) from the moment of admission. Mortality was 63.2% (n=12), of which 16.7% of patients died in the emergency department within 60 minutes, 33.3% — within 6 hours in the intensive care unit, 16.7% — within 6–24 hours. In 33.3% of deaths, the number of days of hospitalization ranged from 2 to 18. Conclusion. The complexity of managing such patients is due to the need for a quick response from a multidisciplinary team of hospital admission departments, timely verification of pulmonary embolism, and assessment of indications and contraindications for thrombolytic therapy.

References

Никулина Н.Н., Тереховская Ю.В. Эпидемиология тромбоэмболии легочной артерии в современном мире: анализ заболеваемости, смертности и проблем их изучения. Российский кардиологический журнал. 2019; 24(6): 103–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2019-6-103-108.

Эрлих А.Д., Атаканова А.Н., Неешпапа А.Г. и др. Российский регистр острой тромбоэмболии лёгочной артерии СИРЕНА: характеристика пациентов и лечение в стационаре. Российский кардиологический журнал. 2020; 25(10): 3849. DOI: 10.15829/1560-4071-2020-3849.

Эрлих А.Д., Барбараш О.Л., Бернс С.А. и др. Шкала SIRENA для оценки риска госпитальной смерти у пациентов с острой лёгочной эмболией. Российский кардиологический журнал. 2020; 25(S4): 4231. DOI: 10.15829/1560-4071-2020-4231.

Barco S., Mahmoudpour S.H. et al. Trends in mortality related to pulmonary embolism in the European Region, 2000–15: analysis of vital registration data from the WHO Mortality Database. Lancet Resp Med. 2020; 8(3): 277–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30354-6.

Bottiger B.W., Arntz H.R., Chamberlain D.A. et al. Thrombolysis during resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359: 2651–62.

Ghanima W., Brodin E., Schultze A. et al. Incidence and prevalence of venous thromboembolism in Norway 2010–2017. Thromb Res. 2020; 195: 165–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2020.07.011.

Goldhaber S.Z., Bounameaux H. Pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis. Lancet. 2012; 379: 1835–46.

Javaudin F., Lascarro, J.-B., Le Bastard Q. et al. Thrombolysis During Resuscitation for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Caused by Pulmonary Embolism Increases 30-Day Survival: Findings From the French National Cardiac Arrest Registry. Chest. 2019; 156(6): 1167–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.07.015.

Jiménez D., Bikdeli B., Barrios D. et al. Epidemiology, patterns of care and mortality for patients with hemodynamically unstable acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism, Int J Cardiol. 2018; 269: 327–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.07.059.

Kempny A., McCabe C., Dimopoulos K. et al. Incidence, mortality and bleeding rates associated with pulmonary embolism in England between 1997 and 2015. Int J Cardiol. 2019; 277: 229–34. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.10.001

Konstantinides S.V., Meyer G., Becattini C. et. al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2020; 41(4): 543–603. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz405.

Lott C., Truhlář A., Alfonzo A. et al. ERC Special Circumstances Writing Group Collaborators. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Cardiac arrest in special circumstances. Resuscitation. 2021; 161: 152–219. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.011.

Mateo Porres-Aguilar I., Rachel P. Rosovsky et al. Pulmonary embolism response teams: Changing the paradigm in the care for acute pulmonary embolism. J of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2022; 20(11): 2457–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.15832

Published
2024-07-07
How to Cite
Averchenko, K., Andreenko, A., Mitichkin, M., Naumov, A., & Timofeev, E. (2024). DIFFICULTIES IN DECISION-MAKING WHEN PROVIDING CARE TO PATIENTS WITH MASSIVE PULMONARY EMBOLISM AND OBSTRUCTIVE SHOCK (THE EXPERIENCE OF THE MARIINSKY HOSPITAL). Medicine: Theory and Practice, 8(4), 256-264. https://doi.org/10.56871/MTP.2023.16.64.047
Section
Статьи